做清秋大梦吧?去看看 US vs. Cruikshank 的判词。


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: doublepar 于 2016-06-07, 21:46:35:

回答: how about allowed only within one's property 由 kma 于 2016-06-07, 17:16:35:

The right there specified is that of "bearing arms for a lawful purpose." This is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence.

大家都不认帐的话,宪法就是一张纸而已 ......




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明