We may not have a choice :)

送交者: silxirt 于 2016-03-18, 15:43:38:

回答: It is too risky. Some damages take decades to fix, other damages are permanent.. 由 ASH 于 2016-03-18, 14:15:09:

Forgot the name, there is a think-tank who never made mistake on this, they predicted 100% who the next president would be (heard it over NPR months ago). By their prediction, Sanders will be the President. It still may happen.

I love free university and nation wide single pay system for medicare, just it is almost impossible to happen in the US.

所有跟贴:

A Sanders presidency is much less harmful than a Trump presidency - ASH (95 bytes) 2016-03-18, 19:41:47 (804263)
- in fact, Sanders is good and Trump is the opposite. (无内容) - Hoffman (0 bytes) 2016-03-18, 20:31:12 (804265)
  - I don't disagree with your (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2016-03-18, 23:59:47 (804271)
    - sort of agree with don't disagree (无内容) - cornbug (0 bytes) 2016-03-19, 01:23:27 (804276)
不是智库，不过有意思，Sanders不会是这个原因还在坚持吧？ (无内容) - Todd (0 bytes) 2016-03-18, 16:27:23 (804259)
found this on the internet - silxirt (247 bytes) 2016-03-18, 16:03:20 (804258)
- it's still possible, if some crazy nut assasinates happy aunt (无内容) - pgss (0 bytes) 2016-03-18, 22:59:34 (804270)
- Looks like their winning streak is coming to a crashing end (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2016-03-18, 19:36:28 (804262)

加跟贴